Peer-reviewed

2026

How occupation shapes awareness and preferences for European funding

European Union Politics

Johannes Lattmann, David Schweizer

The European Union’s (EU) Cohesion Policy is one of the main instruments to tackle the economic struggle of left-behind regions, however, only little is known about the awareness and the opinion of citizens towards this regional policy. This article examines how awareness of EU regional policies and spending preferences varies across occupations. We argue that differences in awareness across occupations are attributable to skill and responsibility differences and divergent work logics. Our analysis of a harmonized Eurobarometer dataset (N = 82,365) provides evidence for differences in EU funding awareness and spending preferences across occupational groups, which correspond to their own material interests. In addition, citizens indicate preferences for funding decisions to be made at the most local level.

2025

Is secular–religious party competition moving online? Digital religious profiles of candidates running for the European Parliament

Frontiers in Political Science

Eva-Maria Euchner, David Schweizer, Daniela Braun

New digital technologies alter various societal spheres, including the landscape of religion and politics. “Christianity influencers,” faith tweets, digital chaplaincy and online Islamic hate speech are notable examples in place. The rapidly growing body of scholarship known as digital religion studies explores the extent to which traditional religious practices are being adapted to digital environments. However, while this nascent field profits from interdisciplinary perspectives, the political dimension of this transformation is still underdeveloped. Specifically, it is unclear how political actors refer to religion during online campaigning across Europe and whether the existing patterns reflect “classical offline divides” between secular and religious parties. This paper contributes to this gap by providing first-hand empirical evidence of online references to religion by candidates running for the European Parliament in 2019 in four countries (Germany, Sweden, the Netherlands and the United Kingdom). The study uses a mixed-methods approach, combining qualitative and quantitative analyses of European politicians’ X (formerly Twitter) profiles. Overall, religion plays a subordinate role in online political campaigning; however, there is substantial country variation, indicating a higher salience of religion in Swedish and Dutch campaigns in comparison to German or British online discourses. Furthermore, candidates from political parties with religious roots are more likely to refer to religion than those from more secular parties, reflecting traditional secular-religious divisions. The paper advances existing research on religion and party politics through its fresh perspective on religion outside classical arenas of political conflict and inside important alternative venues of political competition.

The Differentiated Impact of Perceived EU Regional Policy on Citizens’ Positions on European Integration

Politische Vierteljahreschrift

Marc Debus, David Schweizer

The main goal of the regional development programme of the European Union (EU) is to decrease disparities in the economic situation between the regional units of the EU member states. An important side note effect of EU regional policy is that citizens should be able to directly identify the positive aspects of European integration when realising the impact of the EU for structural programmes in their city or region. We aim to evaluate this mechanism and ask whether the individually perceived benefit of EU regional funds in the home area of a respondent has a positive impact on their position towards European integration. Furthermore, we discuss how a relational perspective on EU regional funds—that is, whether a respondent considers other regions or other EU member states to benefit more from the EU regional funds than their own region—mediates the expected positive impact of EU regional funds on an individual’s position on European integration. We answer these questions by analysing new survey data conducted in two German states, Baden-Wuerttemberg and Thuringia, which differ significantly in terms of the regional funding they receive. The analysis shows not only that there is a significant difference in the positions of respondents on European integration between the two regions but also that perceiving personal benefits of EU regional funding increases the support for European integration. Furthermore, individuals’ thinking that their own region benefits more from EU regional funding than other regions tends to increase their support for European integration.

2024

Data: Climate Policy: Emotions, Attitudes and Trade-Offs

SOEP Innovation Module - Survey Year 2023

Jan Menzner, David Schweizer

This module surveys respondents’ attitudes and emotions towards climate change and their support for various mitigation policies (i.e., push- and pull-measures, regulations). Further, it investigates whether citizens trade off democratic principles for their climate policy goals, and how they perceive and solve the trade-off between economic goals and climate action.

Working papers

The Underlying Dimensions of Political Support

Jan Menzner, David Schweizer

Accepted for publication

ClimaParl: Detecting Climate Change in Political Text

Lukas Isermann, David Schweizer, Noam Himmelrath

Heated debates? How the radical-right affects parliamentary discourse on climate change

David Schweizer

A Natural Divide? Climate Change and Party Unity

David Schweizer

How Growing Climate Concern Erodes Democratic Satisfaction

Jan Menzner, David Schweizer

The Weimar Parliament Database

Benjamin Rohr, John Levi Martin, Jan Kamlah, Julius Diener, David Schweizer

The ECB in National Parliaments: Mapping Discourse and its Drivers

Xavier D’Arcy, Ferdinand Dreher, Niklas Jütting, Cyprien Milea, David Schweizer

Other publications

A 15-year retrospective of European elections: women’s political participation and representation (2024).

Blog entry: EU&I’s “Knowledge Bites” section on their Voting Advice Application website

Milena Rapp, David Schweizer

The elections for the European Parliament are just around the corner. From June 6 to 9, EU citizens are called upon to cast their vote in the European elections. This vote determines who is elected as a Member of the European Parliament (MEP), working on legislation that affects the daily life of Europeans, including laws regarding climate, economic, and security policies. Thus, voting in the European elections can have a great impact. But do Europeans exercise their right to vote and are there differences between men and women? And are there gender-specific differences in the composition of the European Parliament?